|
European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law
Landesgerichtsstraße 11,
A-1080
Vienna
Austria
Telephone: ++43 1 40127-1688
Fax: ++43 1 40127-1685
e-mails: ectil@univie.ac.at
The Role of Tort Law and Insurance in the 21st century
Contents
GOALS OF THE CENTRE
INFORMATION
Goals of the Centre
A.General observations
Liability
law is rapidly changing in quite a number of countries. This is due to
various factors, which are, to a large extent, interrelated:
 |
changing
case law and legislation, sometimes even with (de facto) retroactive
effect; |
 |
technical
and medical developments. As a result of such innovations, to give just
two examples, various occupational diseases
can be attributed to working conditions and personal injury can be
attributed to specific products. From the very moment that causation can
be proven, one enters the thorny ground of whether or not liability can be
established. There is a trend in case law to "disregard" the
state of the art, or, more precisely, to assume that manufacturers and
employers ought to have had at least knowledge of potential dangers. In a
number of countries the state of the art defence cannot be invoked in
product liability cases; |
 |
increased
claim consciousness; |
 |
the
increased incidence of phenomena like, for example, mass torts, multiple
causation, joint and several liability (even if the tortfeasor did not
cause the entire damage), various heads of damages (e.g. ecological damage
and several diseases); |
 |
the
interrelation between liability and insurance. In this context attention
must be paid to the question of whether certain liabilities are still
coverable or not, and, if they are, to what extent. |
Case law and
factual developments will not stop at national borders. To cite just two
examples it is hardly conceivable that there will be no DES cases outside
the Netherlands and the USA, or that repetitive strain injuries will fail
to spread from the UK to the continent.
B. Academic considerations
Tort broke
adrift. Perhaps not on its own. Still, in a number of jurisdictions case
law and legislation are still rather conservative and lacking innovation.
But even in these countries one seriously has to reckon with the
influences of neighbouring countries. Moreover, even if the law is to
remain as it is, the factual circumstances call for reconsideration: does
it fairly fit in our time? Is our tort law still affordable, given that
the number and level of claims is rapidly growing, while insurability is
becoming difficult?
The law of
torts is also changing in another respect. There is a trend towards
harmonising the laws of Europe. Although this is particularly true for
contract law, it is also true for specific areas of tort law, for example,
environmental and product liability. In this context, a more or less
European law on damages may well develop, a desirable development in our
eyes.
In the
future a more comprehensive harmonisation of tort law may be realised by
the European Union or the Council of Europe. Such a development, if
initiated by either of these European institutions is likely to be doomed
fragmentary (sticking to product liability or other specific areas).
It
seems clearly beneficial to the further development of tort law to
accelerate this process. Doing so would ensure that the requirements of
our time be taken into account. Besides, the existence of a unified Code
would also avoid nasty questions of conflicts of laws, especially with
regard to torts of a cross-border nature.
In both
respects we need thorough and extensive knowledge of the laws within the
European countries. Since many developments which influence the European
laws take place in the United States, one should equally focus on
"American" law. All this work could hardly be done by one
scholar, not even a few. Numerous scholars working in their respective
countries are required in order to gain full insight into the particular
field of study.
Of course,
the Centre´s goal is not only - even not primarily - to gather
information concerning the various legal systems and the ways they are
developing. The Centre concentrates on fundamental questions, and focuses
on topics deserving attention in view of their dogmatic and practical
impact. Equal consideration is given to an examination of the solutions
provided by different legal systems and
whether these lead to fair outcomes, taking all relevant circumstances into account (briefly: the interests of victims, tortfeasors and
society at large). Comparative studies, looking not only at solutions for
future cases, but asking how they are reached, will often provide answers
as to how to cope with today's challenges.
C. The importance of liability insurance
It follows
that insurance inevitably plays an important role. Though not decisive in
the development of tort law, one can hardly escape from the impression
that courts and legislators are increasingly willing to address questions
such as:
 |
Can a specific liability be covered by insurance? |
 |
Should mandatory insurance be established or |
 |
should one
create funds (set up by insurers)? |
 |
Are
insurers allowed to refrain from providing coverage and/or to phrase their
coverage as they deem fit (for example: to what extent are claims made
policies admissible?). |
In
this context, one should bear in mind that the affordability of tort law
also requires safe and sound insurers.
It has to be
stressed that we aim at focusing on insurance matters only to the extent
that these have an impact on liability law, or vice versa. Traditional
areas of insurance law (like fire, accident, life, marine and transport
insurance), do not fall within the remit of the Centre due to the little
relevance they have for tort lawyers.
It should
equally be stressed that an examination of insurance matters in this
connection is still rather exceptional, although some scholars already pay
attention to this topic. However, this is not yet done in a more
systematic way, seen from the angle of a variety of legal systems. Even
less statistics are taken into account, simply because these are hardly
available. For instance: compensation for pure economic loss may be
adequate as long as the number and level of claims are relatively small.
But should a similar rule apply if the requirement to pay compensation
would imply that the continuation of useful economic activities like those
of auditing, banking and legal advice is hindered or endangered?
D. The activities of the Centre
The Centre´s
goals are already briefly mentioned under A-C above. In short:
 | The Centre
conducts research on tort law in a wide range of countries, paying special
attention to major developments;
|
 | The
potential consequences of such developments are considered as are the ways
in which they might affect other legal systems;
|
 |
The Centre aims to influence the law by thorough comparative research
which is subsequently published in the form of books, reports, etc. The
challenge for the future for tort lawyers and for a tort law Institute
seems to be that it could benefit from knowledge from a variety of
sources, which should be taken into account altogether, notably:
 | knowledge
of many legal systems and the way society copes with the law as it stands;
|
 | knowledge
regarding the most up-to-date developments;
|
 | knowledge
as to how information which is otherwise not, or only on a very limited
scale, available can be accessed. It seems likely that cooperative
insurers and hopefully national governments could be such a source of
information to the Centre as to relevant facts and developments of the
consequences of the developments for insurers and insurability;
|
|
 |
The Centre
has embarked on a harmonisation project: European tort law principles or a
"Restatement" of the law of torts. |
 |
The Centre
also has an additional benefit. PhD candidates and other scholars may
enjoy a few months research in the Centre. They can work on their own
projects or participate in one of the Centre´s projects and get a
remuneration for their contribution. |
|
|